Which is the correct definition of strict liability?
A
crime where you only need to prove the mens rea.
A
crime where you only need to prove the actus reus.
A
crime where you need to prove the actus reus and the mens rea.
A
crime where you need to prove neither the actus reus or the mens
rea.
Which of these are strict liability crimes?
Murder
Robbery
Contempt
of court
Blasphemy
Which case said that courts should presume statutes
which don't specify whether they are strict liability or not are not creating
strict liability offences.
B
v DPP
Prince
Gammon
Sweet
v Parsley
Which of these cases didn't concern a strict liability
offence?